Our World: Standing on a landmine
In his words, “As a citizen, and as president, I believe that Muslims have the same right to practice their religion as everyone else in this country. And that includes the right to build a place of worship and a community center on private property in Lower Manhattan, in accordance with local laws and ordinances. This is America. Our commitment to religious freedom must be unshakable. The principle that people of all faiths are welcome in this country and that they will not be treated differently by their government is essential to who we are. The writ of the Founders must endure.”Search This Blog
Blog Archive
- November 2023 (2)
- January 2023 (1)
- November 2022 (2)
- October 2022 (1)
- August 2022 (1)
- March 2022 (1)
- December 2021 (6)
- November 2021 (2)
- October 2021 (1)
- September 2021 (11)
- August 2021 (12)
- July 2021 (36)
- June 2021 (38)
- May 2021 (14)
- March 2021 (21)
- February 2021 (20)
- January 2021 (23)
- December 2020 (12)
- November 2020 (16)
- October 2020 (5)
- September 2020 (23)
- August 2020 (18)
- July 2020 (28)
- May 2020 (1)
- April 2020 (29)
- March 2020 (7)
- February 2020 (8)
- January 2020 (2)
- October 2019 (7)
- September 2019 (10)
- August 2019 (5)
- June 2019 (1)
- May 2019 (1)
- January 2019 (4)
- November 2018 (1)
- October 2018 (1)
- September 2018 (1)
- July 2018 (1)
- April 2018 (2)
- March 2018 (1)
- February 2018 (2)
- January 2018 (1)
- November 2017 (1)
- September 2017 (5)
- August 2017 (6)
- March 2017 (4)
- February 2017 (1)
- August 2016 (1)
- June 2016 (2)
- May 2016 (1)
- April 2016 (6)
- March 2016 (8)
- February 2016 (6)
- November 2015 (1)
- August 2015 (2)
- June 2015 (2)
- April 2015 (1)
- February 2015 (2)
- January 2015 (7)
- December 2014 (10)
- November 2014 (13)
- October 2014 (6)
- September 2014 (5)
- August 2014 (30)
- July 2014 (12)
- June 2014 (7)
- May 2014 (2)
- April 2014 (6)
- March 2014 (14)
- February 2014 (5)
- January 2014 (12)
- December 2013 (5)
- November 2013 (2)
- October 2013 (6)
- September 2013 (16)
- August 2013 (14)
- July 2013 (22)
- June 2013 (17)
- May 2013 (25)
- April 2013 (38)
- March 2013 (14)
- February 2013 (33)
- January 2013 (12)
- December 2012 (12)
- November 2012 (19)
- October 2012 (24)
- September 2012 (17)
- August 2012 (6)
- July 2012 (7)
- June 2012 (21)
- May 2012 (20)
- April 2012 (33)
- March 2012 (43)
- February 2012 (92)
- January 2012 (139)
- December 2011 (145)
- November 2011 (1)
- October 2011 (1)
- September 2011 (2)
- August 2011 (5)
- July 2011 (55)
- June 2011 (218)
- May 2011 (130)
- April 2011 (174)
- March 2011 (114)
- February 2011 (324)
- January 2011 (105)
- December 2010 (92)
- November 2010 (47)
- October 2010 (56)
- September 2010 (33)
- August 2010 (48)
- July 2010 (56)
- April 2010 (1)
"Obama’s stance on the Ground Zero mosque should signal to Israel that the president is so wed to his ideology that he will push it regardless of political conditions."
ReplyDelete"THERE ARE two possible explanations for Obama’s move. Either he was motivated by politics or he was motivated by ideology. The view that Obama was motivated by politics is easily dismissed. With more than two-thirds of Americans telling pollsters they oppose the Ground Zero mosque project, it makes no political sense for a politician to strike out a position in favor of the mosque. Indeed, major Democrats have either refused to state a position on the issue or, like New York Governor David Paterson, they have recommended that the mosque builders construct their mosque elsewhere.
ReplyDelete"Perhaps Obama thought he could he could get away with making his statement. However, with his polling numbers consistently eroding, it is hard to imagine Obama’s advisers would have told him that was a realistic view.
ReplyDeleteThis leaves ideology. But what ideology motivates Obama to embrace such an unpopular initiative at such an explosive political juncture? Obama and his supporters would like us to believe this is a civil rights issue. In his defense of the Ground Zero mosque, Obama claimed his position was based on the American values such as, “The laws that we apply without regard to race, or religion, or wealth, or status. Our capacity to show not merely tolerance, but respect towards those who are different from us.”
"But if Obama is motivated by a belief in civil rights that is so strong it propels him to take on deeply unpopular causes in an election season, then one could reasonably expect that his support for civil rights would be absolute. That is, one could expect him to use the same yardstick for all groups, in all places and at all times."
"But for Obama, there are some groups who must be denied the same civil rights he upholds as absolute in his defense of the plan to build a mosque at Ground Zero. As Obama has made clear since his first days in office, he believes that Jews should be denied the right to their property in Jerusalem, Judea and Samaria simply because they are Jews.
ReplyDeleteOBAMA IS so firm in his belief that Jews should be denied civil rights in Israel’s capital and in the heartland of Jewish history that he has provoked multiple crises in his relations with Israel to advance this bigoted view. Almost from his first day in office Obama has struck out a radical position in which he has insisted that Jews must be prohibited from building anything – synagogues, homes, nurseries, schools – in Judea, Jerusalem and Samaria on land they own. Jews – Israeli and non-Israeli – should be barred from exercising their property rights even if their construction plans have already been approved “in accordance with local laws and ordinances.”
>>>>!!!!!! "At the same time, Obama has insisted that Israel take no action to enforce its “local laws and ordinances” against illegal structures built by Arabs in Jerusalem, Judea, or Samaria.
ReplyDeleteNext month the deeply discriminatory and legally dubious 10-month moratorium on Jewish building in Judea and Samaria that Obama coerced Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu into instituting is set to end. So now Obama is putting the full weight of the White House on Israel to again coerce Netanyahu into prolonging the discriminatory ban that denies the civil rights and property rights of Jews simply because they are Jewish.
Obama claims to be embracing the nullification of Jewish civil right in the interests of peace. In his stated view, to forge peace in the Middle East it is necessary for the Palestinians to achieve statehood. But it hard to see how the establishment of a Palestinian state squares with Obama’s purported dedication to civil rights.
In a briefing with the Egyptian media last week Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas told reporters that no Jews will be allowed to live in a future Palestinian state. He also said that while he would agree to allow NATO forces to deploy in the future Palestinian state, he would not permit any Jewish soldiers to serve in the NATO units stationed on the territory of such a state. As he put it, “I will not agree that there will be Jews among NATO forces and I will not allow even one Israeli to live amongst us on the Palestinian soil.”
The notion that an inherently anti-Semitic Palestinian state, predicated on Jew hatred that strong, could possibly live at peace with Israel is simply ridiculous. But tellingly, in all the American pressure that has been placed on Abbas to begin direct negotiations with Israel, at no time has the administration been reported to have insisted that Abbas abandon his anti-Semitism. Obama has made no statement addressing the fact that the Palestinians demand that Jews be barred from living in the future Palestinian state. He has certainly not objected to this position although it squares with none of the American values of tolerance and property rights he upheld so strongly in his remarks on the Ground Zero mosque."
>>>>!!!!!!!>>>> "At the same time, Obama has insisted that Israel take no action to enforce its “local laws and ordinances” against illegal structures built by Arabs in Jerusalem, Judea, or Samaria.
ReplyDeleteNext month the deeply discriminatory and legally dubious 10-month moratorium on Jewish building in Judea and Samaria that Obama coerced Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu into instituting is set to end. So now Obama is putting the full weight of the White House on Israel to again coerce Netanyahu into prolonging the discriminatory ban that denies the civil rights and property rights of Jews simply because they are Jewish.
Obama claims to be embracing the nullification of Jewish civil right in the interests of peace. In his stated view, to forge peace in the Middle East it is necessary for the Palestinians to achieve statehood. But it hard to see how the establishment of a Palestinian state squares with Obama’s purported dedication to civil rights.
!!!>>>>!!!!!! The KEY>>>> "In a briefing with the Egyptian media last week Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas told reporters that no Jews will be allowed to live in a future Palestinian state. He also said that while he would agree to allow NATO forces to deploy in the future Palestinian state, he would not permit any Jewish soldiers to serve in the NATO units stationed on the territory of such a state. As he put it, “I will not agree that there will be Jews among NATO forces and I will not allow even one Israeli to live amongst us on the Palestinian soil.”
ReplyDeleteThe notion that an inherently anti-Semitic Palestinian state, predicated on Jew hatred that strong, could possibly live at peace with Israel is simply ridiculous. But tellingly, in all the American pressure that has been placed on Abbas to begin direct negotiations with Israel, at no time has the administration been reported to have insisted that Abbas abandon his anti-Semitism. Obama has made no statement addressing the fact that the Palestinians demand that Jews be barred from living in the future Palestinian state. He has certainly not objected to this position although it squares with none of the American values of tolerance and property rights he upheld so strongly in his remarks on the Ground Zero mosque.